• Crypto Is Easy
  • Posts
  • Exposing Bitcoin Data Models and Cycle Theories: Good, Bad, and Ugly

Exposing Bitcoin Data Models and Cycle Theories: Good, Bad, and Ugly

Are you buying into these?

Crypto is full of data models and theories about when the market will reach its peak and bottom.

Are they still valid? Do they still work? Did they ever work? Can you plan around them?

Which one is best? Which gets closest? How do you know which to follow or how to use each of them?

This report goes through all of the major models to answer those questions. Read below for the definitive look at the most popular data models and cycle theories. Or, listen to the AI bots talk about it on their podcast, which is linked below.

Table of Contents

  • Halving Cycle: Myth or Reality?

  • Four-Year Cycle: Close Enough for Government Work

  • Logarithmic Growth Curves: Correct But Irrelevant

  • Pi Cycle: Valid but Not in the Way You Think

  • Institutions Cycle: A Speculative Model

  • Expanding Cycles: Once Maligned, Now Valid (Kinda)

  • On-Chain Models—Do They Predict Bitcoin's Peak?

  • Power Law and Stock-to-Flow: Which is Best?

  • U2R Model: the Only Model That's Always Right

The rest of this post is for premium readers only.

Join 500+ premium readers and unlock full access to this post, and other all other premium subscriber-only content.

Already a paying subscriber? Sign In.

Premium gets you:

  • • Exclusive bitcoin and altcoin reports to help you invest smarter and grow your portfolio
  • • My proven strategy to buy and sell bitcoin
  • • Direct contact with me. Ask your questions and get expert guidance
  • • Premium written and video analysis to help you make better investment decisions
  • • Annual members get a huge discount and, on average, see 30% better results than monthly subscribers

Reply

or to participate.